Wednesday, December 8, 2010

All Decked Out in Lovely Scientific Dress

A must readDr. Wolfgang Smith writes, "As a scientific theory, Darwinism would have been jettisoned long ago. The point, however, is that the doctrine of evolution has swept the world, not on the strength of its scientific merits, but precisely in its capacity as a Gnostic myth. It affirms, in effect, that living beings created themselves, which is in essence a metaphysical claim...

Thus, in the final analysis, evolutionism is in truth a metaphysical doctrine decked out in scientific garb. In other words, it is a scientistic myth. And the myth is Gnostic, because it implicitly denies the transcendent origin of being; for indeed, only after the living creature has been speculatively reduced to an aggregate of particles does Darwinist transformism become conceivable.

Darwinism, therefore, continues the ancient Gnostic practice of depreciating “God, the Father Almighty, Creator of Heaven and earth.” It perpetuates, if you will, the venerable Gnostic tradition of “Jehovah bashing.” And while this in itself may gladden Gnostic hearts, one should not fail to observe that the doctrine plays a vital role in the economy of Neo-Gnostic thought, for only under the auspices of Darwinist “self-creation” does the Good News of “self-salvation” acquire a semblance of sense. Pp.242-43

Aye, Popper: Karl Popper was one of the most respected philosophers of science, though he rankled some by insisting on humility in method:

"The title of this lecture," he wrote, "is likely, I fear, to offend some critical ears. For although 'Sources of Knowledge' is in order, and 'Sources of Error' would have been in order too…".

" has nothing to do with the quest for certainty or probability or reliability. We are not interested in establishing scientific theories as secure or certain, or probable...It can even be shown that all theories, including the best, have the same probability, namely zero... the realization that our attempts to see and to find the truth are not final, but open to improvement; that our knowledge, our doctrine, is conjectural; that it consists of guesses, of hypotheses rather than of final and certain truths---Karl Popper, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, 1963, 1965, pp. 3, 229, 192, 151.

Malcolm Muggeridge: "I myself am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially the extent to which it’s been applied, will be one of the great jokes in the history books in the future. Posterity will marvel that so very flimsy and dubious an hypothesis could be accepted with the incredible credulity that it has." – Deceit, p. 164," The End of Christendom (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1980, sp. 43.)

That everything grows from the simple to the complex is a myth-projection and forgets that the seed comes from a tree as "in the beginning". Evolution is an interpretive model, a hypothesis, nothing more.

--->Pope: Homosexuality Incompatible With Priesthood...

--->His mother did not abort. Nothing keeps him down. And wow, does he show us how we get back up when we are down...(click) His is a life 'not worth living'?!

No comments:

Post a Comment