Thursday, November 11, 2010

The Pope Rattles the Bishops: "Learn from Saint Francis" (in Liturgy Too)

By Sandro Magister

He really knew what true liturgical reform is, writes Benedict XVI in a message that is a severe rebuke to the Italian Catholic hierarchy. Where, in the liturgical field, Ratzinger's opponents continue to prevail.

ROME, November 12, 2010 – The last two popes, on numerous occasions, have pointed to the Italian Church and its episcopate as a "model" for other nations.

There is one field, however, in which the Italian Church does not shine. It is that of the liturgy.

This was made clear by the severe lesson that Benedict XVI gave to the Italian bishops gathered in Assisi for their general assembly from November 8-11, an assembly centered on an examination of the new translation of the Roman missal.

In the message that he addressed to the bishops on the eve of the assembly, pope Joseph Ratzinger did not limit himself to greetings and good wishes. He was the one to dictate the criteria of a "true" liturgical reform.

"Every true reformer," he wrote, "is obedient to the faith: he does not act in an arbitrary manner, he does not appropriate any discretion over the rite; he is not the owner, but the custodian of the treasury instituted by the Lord and entrusted to us. The whole Church is present in every liturgy: adhering to its form is a condition of authenticity for what is celebrated."

The pope gave as an example of genuine liturgical reform the Fourth Lateran Council of 1215, which put into the hands of the priests the "Breviary" with the liturgy of the hours, and reinforced the belief in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharistic bread and wine...Read it all

--->Benedict XVI "wants to encourage the reception of Communion on the tongue, kneeling, out of respect for the Real Presence in the Sacrament"...Read on

--->Pope calls for Church to rediscover the Word of God. “The history of salvation is not mythology, but a true history,” the Pope said...calls for deeper study on the relationship between inspiration and inerrancy... Note: Neo-modernists need not apply for the task.

--->Dr. Germain Grisez on the matter of inspiration and inerrancy
of scripture...

--->Care of vulnerable people by Jean Vanier. "I have just celebrated my 82nd birthday. As well as a sense of deep gratitude for my life, there are losses. Over the past two years I have significantly curtailed my long distance travel. I grow tired more easily, and need to nap with regularity. However I experience great joy as those whom I have welcomed over the years, now care for me.

They have spared me for the last decade from doing the dishes! More recently theyobserve my physical fatigue, patting me on the head with great tenderness saying: "Poor old man". My vulnerability is cherished by them, as theirs has been by me, and this helps me to welcome mine in its newest incarnation, old age with its joys but also with its various indignities...Read it all

--->Catholic Encyclopedia on Dionysius the Pseudo-Areopagite: The works of Dionysius ... introduced into Western literature, were readily accepted by the medieval Scholastics. The great masters of Saint-Victor at Paris, foremost among them the much admired Hugh, based their teaching on the doctrine of Dionysius. Peter Lombard and the great Dominican and Franciscan scholars, Alexander of Hales, Albertus Magnus, Thomas Aquinas, Bonaventure, adopted his theses and arguments. Master poets, e.g. Dante, and historians, e.g. Otto of Freising, built on his foundations. Scholars as renowned as Robert Grosseteste of Lincoln and Vincent of Beauvais drew upon him freely.

Popular religious books, such as the "Legenda aurea" of Giacomo da Voragine and the "Life of Mary" by Brother Philip, gave him a cordial welcome. The great mystics, Eckhardt, Tauler, Suso, and others, entered the mysterious obscurity of Dionysius with holy reverence. In rapid succession there appeared a number of translations: Latin translations by Joannes Sarrazenus (1170), Robert Grosseteste (about 1220), Thomas Vercellensis (1400), Ambrosius Camaldulensis (1436), Marsilius Ficinus (1492); in the sixteenth century those of Faber Stapulensis, Perionius, etc. Among the commentaries that of Hugh of Saint-Victor is notable for its warmth, that of Albertus Magnus for its extent, that of St. Thomas for its accuracy, that of Denys the Carthusian for its pious spirit and its masterly inclusion of all previous commentaries---Catholic Encylopedia, 1905 See the entire CE article to get more complete picture of who Dionysius was....

--->Pope Benedict Recommends Dionysius as One Who "Has New Relevance as a Mediator in Dialogue
With Theologies of Asia...

--->"Bailout money is just going to line the pockets of the wealthy..."

--->The West’s over-sexualized culture is feminism’s byproduct -- By Caroline May...

--->New technologies confuse reality and fiction says Pope...called [on] Catholic communications experts to base their efforts in the truth of the Word of God," reports the Catholic News Agency. "The "Word,' he said, continues to be the 'fundamental and essential instrument of communication....The image can also become independent from reality, it can give birth to a virtual word, with various consequences -- above all the risk of indifference towards real life," he said. ...Read on

--->Report: Obama to Renege on Afghan Drawdown... Note: Yet another broken promise?

--->President Obama can't close deals at G-20 summit...

--->Brazil's Lula Says World Headed For 'Bankruptcy' Unless Rich Nations Act...

--->General Motors preparing to close deal with China

--->Bishops: Think Twice Before Taking Psychiatric Advice. Mr. Cal Samra writes, "The secular press has been in full hue and cry over the clerical sex-abuse scandal in the U.S. and Europe. Many of their criticisms of the Catholic hierarchy’s mismanagement of the situation — transferring pederast and pedophile priests from parish to parish and covering up their crimes — are valid. But, to my knowledge, not a single journalist in either the secular or religious press has had the courage or the objectivity to question and investigate the high-priced psychiatrists and mental-health “experts” who supposedly screened these priests before seminary and before ordination, and who treated them after their crimes and acted as counselors to the bishops who shuffled them around... These so-called experts were the sophisticated folks who devised psychological tests to screen seminary candidates and candidates for ordination — tests that obviously failed...They were the experts who treated pederast and pedophile priests at great cost, pronounced them “cured,” and recommended to the bishops that they be reassigned to another church, where, it was discovered, they were in fact not cured....Read on

--->Smart: IMF Shadow Looms as Irish Sacrifice to Avoid Bailout...

--->Mao's Little Helpers. When Mao Tse-Tung launched the Cultural Revolution in May 1966, one of the principal targets of attack were intellectuals. Thousands were silenced, beaten to death, imprisoned, tortured or sent out to the countryside to be re-educated and purified through manual labour. Many of their persecutors were university students and schoolchildren. But theirs was also a death warrant signed by fellow-travelling intellectuals in the West. Richard Wolin advances no one theory to explain this act of betrayal. The Maoist temptation was part radical chic, part revolutionary tourism, part orientalism...Read on

--->Europeans Cast Critical Eye
on Homeopathy...

No comments:

Post a Comment